Partida comentada...




| Place | Name | Fed. | FIDE | Total |
| 1 | Mamedyarov, Shakhriyar | AZE | 2726 | 11.5 |
| 2 | Nepomniachtchi, Ian | RUS | 2762 | 11.0 |
| 3 | Grischuk, Alexander | RUS | 2825 | 10.5 |
| 4 | Le, Quang Liem | VIE | 2681 | 10.0 |
| 5 | Guseinov, Gadir | AZE | 2640 | 9.0 |
| 6 | Khairullin, Ildar | RUS | 2683 | 9.0 |
| 7 | Andreikin, Dmitry | RUS | 2692 | 9.0 |
| 8 | Movsesian, Sergei | ARM | 2680 | 9.0 |
| 9 | Khismatullin, Denis | RUS | 2674 | 9.0 |
| 10 | Inarkiev, Ernesto | RUS | 2696 | 9.0 |
| 11 | Cheparinov, Ivan | BUL | 2678 | 9.0 |
| 12 | Riazantsev, Alexander | RUS | 2616 | 9.0 |
| 13 | Vitiugov, Nikita | RUS | 2719 | 9.0 |
| 14 | Mamedov, Rauf | AZE | 2712 | 9.0 |
| 15 | Bologan, Viktor | MDA | 2663 | 8.5 |
| 16 | Nguyen, Ngoc Truong Son | VIE | 2625 | 8.5 |
| 17 | Dreev, Aleksey | RUS | 2746 | 8.5 |
| 18 | Ponomariov, Ruslan | UKR | 2743 | 8.5 |
| 19 | Vallejo Pons, Francisco | ESP | 2706 | 8.5 |
| 20 | Najer, Evgeniy | RUS | 2638 | 8.5 |
| 21 | Kamsky, Gata | USA | 2751 | 8.5 |

Rnk.
|
Name | Nat. | Rtng | Total | |||||||
1
|
Le, Quang Liem | VIE | 2771 | 20.5 | |||||||
2
|
Grischuk, Alexander | RUS | 2858 | 20.0 | |||||||
3
|
Ponomariov, Ruslan | UKR | 2743 | 20.0 | |||||||
4
|
Nepomniachtchi, Ian | RUS | 2813 | 20.0 | |||||||
5
|
Nguyen, Ngoc Truong Son | VIE | 2665 | 19.5 | |||||||
6
|
Mamedov, Rauf | AZE | 2718 | 19.5 | |||||||
7
|
Dubov, Daniil | RUS | 2655 | 18.0 | |||||||
8
|
Movsesian, Sergei | ARM | 2696 | 18.0 | |||||||
9
|
Andreikin, Dmitry | RUS | 2824 | 17.5 | |||||||
10
|
Tkachiev, Vladislav | FRA | 2657 | 17.0 | |||||||
11
|
Smirin, Ilia | ISR | 2650 | 17.0 | |||||||
12
|
Sargissian, Gabriel | ARM | 2723 | 17.0 | |||||||
13
|
Akopian, Vladimir | ARM | 2691 | 17.0 | |||||||
14
|
Najer, Evgeniy | RUS | 2633 | 16.5 | |||||||
15
|
Dreev, Aleksey | RUS | 2711 | 16.5 | |||||||
16
|
Mamedyarov, Shakhriyar | AZE | 2777 | 16.5 | |||||||
17
|
Kamsky, Gata | USA | 2734 | 16.5 | |||||||
18
|
Grachev, Boris | RUS | 2590 | 16.5 | |||||||
19
|
Safarli, Eltaj | AZE | 2597 | 16.0 | |||||||
20
|
Riazantsev, Alexander | RUS | 2606 | 16.0 | |||||||
21
|
Bologan, Viktor | MDA | 2650 | 16.0 | |||||||
| (...) | |||||||||||

Scoreboard
|
Gelfand,Boris (2733) - Kamsky,Gata (2732) [A10]
WCh Candidates - Rapids Kazan RUS (2.7), 16.05.2011
1.c4 g6 2.Nf3 Nf6 3.Nc3 d5 4.cxd5 Nxd5 5.g3 Bg7 6.Bg2 0-0 7.0-0 c5 8.Qa4 Nb4 9.d3 Bd7 10.Qd1 Bc6 11.Be3 Nd7 12.Rc1 Rc8 13.Qb3 e6 14.Rfd1 a5 15.Bg5 Qe8 16.a3??
E agora ? As negras jogam e ganham !
16...c4! The queen is trapped. 17.Qxc4 (17.dxc4 only makes it worse: 17...Nc5 and the queen is still lost) 17...Bxf3 18.Bxf3 Rxc4 19.dxc4 Nc6. Black has a queen for rook and knight. Kamsky knows how to play it and brings home the bacon. 20.Nb5 Nc5 21.b4 axb4 22.axb4 Nxb4 23.Rb1 Nba6 24.Nd6 Qa4 25.Nxb7 Nxb7 26.Bxb7 Qxc4 27.Bf3 h6 28.Be3 Nb4 29.Rbc1 Nc2 30.Ba7 Qa4 31.Bb6 Nd4 32.Bxd4 Bxd4 33.Rd3 Bf6 34.Rc7 Rd8 0-1.



![]()
Alexander Grischuk
Vassily Ivanchuk

Reference is made to the ongoing World Championship cycle.
The purpose of this letter is to inform you of my decision not to take part in the planned Candidate Matches between March and May 2011.
After careful consideration I’ve reached the conclusion that the ongoing 2008–2012 cycle does not represent a system, sufficiently modern and fair, to provide the motivation I need to go through a lengthy process of preparations and matches and to perform at my best.
Reigning champion privileges, the long (five year) span of the cycle, changes made during the cycle resulting in a new format (Candidates) that no World Champion has had to go through since Kasparov, puzzling ranking criteria as well as the shallow ceaseless match-after-match concept are all less than satisfactory in my opinion.
By providing you with four months notice before the earliest start of the Candidates as well as in time before you have presented player contracts or detailed regulations, I rest assured that you will be able to find an appropriate replacement.
Although the purpose of this letter is not to influence you to make further changes to the ongoing cycle, I would like to take the opportunity to present a few ideas about future cycles in line with our input to FIDE during the December 27th 2008 phone conference between FIDE leaders and a group of top-level players.
In my opinion privileges should in general be abolished and a future World Championship model should be based on a fair fight between the best players in the World, on equal terms. This should apply also to the winner of the previous World Championship, and especially so when there are several players at approximately the same level in the world elite. (Why should one player have one out of two tickets to the final to the detriment of all remaining players in the world? Imagine that the winner of the 2010 Football World Cup would be directly qualified to the 2014 World Cup final while all the rest of the teams would have to fight for the other spot.)
One possibility for future cycles would be to stage an 8-10 player World Championship tournament similar to the 2005 and 2007 events.
The proposal to abolish the privileges of the World Champion in the future is not in any way meant as criticism of, or an attack on, the reigning World Champion Viswanathan Anand, who is a worthy World Champion, a role model chess colleague and a highly esteemed opponent.
Rest assured that I am still motivated to play competitive chess. My current plan is to continue to participate in well-organised top-level tournaments and to try to maintain the no 1 spot on the rating list that I have successfully defended for most of 2010.
Best regards,
IGM Magnus Carlsen
.

XXVII SuperGM Linares ESP (10), 24.02.2010 [Comentários do jovem sub GM Anish Giri]
1.e4 c5 2.Nf3 d6 3.d4 cxd4 4.Nxd4 Nf6 5.Nc3 a6 6.f3!? Qb6 7.Nb3 e6 8.Bf4 Qc7 9.Qd2 Nc6 10.0-0-0 Ne5 11.Bg3!? Vallejo introduces a new idea, getting a very atypical position for a Najdorf. 11...Be7 12.f4 Ned7 13.Be2 e5!? An interesting and strong idea, not letting White play e5 himself. 14.Nd5 Nxd5 15.exd5 Bf6 16.fxe5 Nxe5 17.Rhf1 Qe7 18.Kb1 0-0
19.Na5!? Bd7 20.Qb4!? Interesting moves by Vallejo, making it difficult for Grischuk to find a good plan. 20...Rab8?! 21.Rde1 b5?! I must say I really don't like these two moves by Black. Now Vallejo should have probably played 22.Bf3! making the threat of Nc6 even stronger. Instead he played 22.Nc6 immediately and while retaining an advantage, was probably not enough to win. 22...Bxc6 23.dxc6 Qc7 24.Qe4 Rbe8 25.Qd5 Re6
26.Bg4. At first sight this looks very strong, but Vallejo in fact has only forced a draw. 26...Nxg4 27.Rxe6 fxe6 28.Qxe6+ Rf7 29.Qe8+ Rf8 30.Qe6+ Rf7 31.Qe8+ Rf8 32.Qe6+ ½-½


Jogue com todo o Mundo !